— ROGERS

Archive
March, 2008 Monthly archive

The latest edition of Monocle has an article about the traction that film maintains in Japan [Film Stars]. While the numbers may be small (film cannot best the onward march of digital), it does in my opinion, illustrate something which oddly fits with the Japanese psyche. Retro cool? Sentimental regret? Just another Japanese subculture to enjoy?

The advantage in Japan, of course, are the huge number of recently “retired” used-cameras, at very reasonable prices; an abundance of shops that will actually sell a selection of decent film stock; the ability to process black-and-white almost anywhere (!); and a huge, photo-mad, gadget-saturated population…

So does this predilection towards film indicate craft, stubbornness, or nostalgia? Probably all three. But shops such as Map Camera — stocked to the rafters with beautiful, mint-condition, second hand cameras — are a seductive sight. It isn’t hard in Japan to arm yourself with a pretty decent camera and a pocket full of film. There is even choice: from obscure Soviet cameras to large format ones as big as your head, which can be found inside and out of the normal camera shop radar.

I’ll bet that a lot of the people chewing through film have come from shooting a lot of digital. In going back to film, they get to prove their photographic chops without chimping.

The result of all this is that there are film-loaded cameras in Japan exposing away in almost pointed contrition for discarded analogue ways. Of course this happens in other countries, but perhaps without the same readily accessible fervour.

Firing off exposures as loosely as people do with digital cameras may just create more visual noise – but there will always be beauty that emerges from the rough.

Read More
iPhone.jpg File under obscure: The iPhone’s colour gamut is quite good! Which can’t be a bad thing, right?

Read More

Greyscale Gorilla’s review of Aperture 2.0.

When Aperture 2.0 came out. I was pleasantly surprised to see that apple had dropped the price to $199. Early reviews of the software claimed that the speed issues were also solved, and the the new version was super fast. So far, so good. When I go take a closer look at the specs however, I am astonished to see that Apple Aperture still had no Curves. Thanks right, after all the criticism, Apple still decides to leave out the most flexible color correction tool available. I understand that Aperture is not supposed to be a full replacement for Photoshop. I don’t expect Aperture to have some esoteric Photoshop feature like Gradient Map, or be able to execute complicated layer based photo editing, but I am talking about Curves here.

And the follow-up:

Why did I decide on Aperture over Lightroom? It was the ease of use, and overall feature set that brought be back to Aperture over Lightroom. The full frame mode is GREAT. I can flip through all the images and quickly rate and process the best ones checking for focus. The full RGB levels editor in Aperture is actually MORE flexible than Lightroom’s curves. HOW? The ability to adjust the “quarter pointsâ€� on the levels graph allows one to emulate curves. It’s a little tricky to get used to, but after I figured it out, it all became clear. And, with the ability to adjust the red green and blue separate, I can do 90% of what curves can do.

And a different review going the other way:

I spent a couple of days with it and to be honest couldn’t see anything that would stop me pushing ahead with my migration to Lightroom. Ironically some of the new search options (â€�have adjustmentsâ€�) actually made it easier to manage the data migration. And whilst speed had improved, it still wasn’t snappy in the same way Lightroom is.

It seems to me the number one Aperture plug-in would be a curves tool. Number two would be Noise Ninja (or similar). And if only there was a way to save “looks” like there is in Lightroom, although someone has developed a work-around… (can’t find the link, but basically it was making a library of your favourite photo’s with their preset looks, and lifting and stamping from them – simple, but workable).

Read More

200803131020.jpg While I stand in my kitchen, sipping my morning coffee, a couple of junkies outside are locked in the slowest verbal jousting I have ever heard. Each side seems to take a little nap between responses… I hope they finish before noon.

They probably wouldn’t be arguing if only they knew that details of the Canon 5D MkII have been leaked/rumoured/invented at the Digital Photography Review forums (and further comment here). Supposedly there will be an official announcement April 22.

Features (allegedly) include:

  • A new full-frame sensor with fancier noise reduction
  • Weather sealing like the 1D series
  • 15.3 MP
  • ISO 12800 (hmmm)
  • Micro lens fine adjustment
  • EOS Integrated Cleaning System
  • Live View (meh!)
  • 6/3 fps continuous shooting for up to 68 frames
  • MSRP $3499 USD, available June 2

This covers my wishlist, so much so, I am willing to believe. Anyway, it must be true, I read it on an internet chat forum. It does seem like a plausible response to the excellent Nikon D3 – what a happy day for digital SLR-ists.

I think the junkies outside must have heard. Argument finished.

Read More

I was searching for more documentation on the REDLog and PDLog LUTs* this evening, particularly so that we could get more precise input/output from our Nucoda FilmMaster for RED-to-film tests. In this case I want to convert RED Raw (R3D) footage to dpx, import that into our FilmMaster without losing any information, and then export out in a way which works for the film-out facility.

However, by the looks of this exchange, it would seem that RED is keeping that information very close to their chests (they have promised to release it to third parties in April). So for now you can only access their LUTs through REDAlert, REDCine, or SCRATCH. Even then, the conversion through the RED software is slightly nebulous, because your only choices for working with the outside world (under their workflow) is to go linear (not desirable for film) or to use the ill-defined PDLog (supposedly a R3D-to-Cineon spec). But who would know…

Not making these LUTs available as documents is like finding out your shiny new toy didn’t come with batteries on a public holiday. It’s not an insurmountable problem, but irritating. I guess we’ll have to keep rolling our own.

*Definiton: A LUT – look up table – describes how the colours and luminance of an image should actually look. Your computer uses one to show images on the screen, although maybe called something else – like ColorSync™. They are used for everything from inkjet printers, to computer monitors, to printing to 35mm film – like Ansell Adam’s zone system on steroids – and they are supposed to keep an image looking the same despite the viewing format.

UPDATE: I am quite enthusiastic about the RED, and don’t want to get down and dirty on what is, to be fair, a revolutionary camera. However, I thought this was quite interesting:

redlog_crop.jpg

This is a crop of a REDLog output from REDAlert, material was rated at 320 ISO.

PDLog_685_crop.jpg

This is a crop of a PDLog 685 output from REDAlert. It maps the peak values (like the sparkle above the eye) to 685 (of the 1023 scale). Under the Cineon spec, 685 is white. The rest of the values (to 1023) are headroom. Rolling off at 685 effectively removes any notion of headroom.

PDLog_985_crop.jpg

This is a crop of a PDLog 985 output from REDAlert. It maps the peak values to 985 (of the 1023 scale). From what I can tell, this has a closer correlation to the original REDLog file, however, it lifts the black point significantly, so I am unsure as to the application of this except that it uses more steps of the available 10-bit scale. If this was designed to cheat in more headroom, then the black point would probably not want to lift any higher than it is in the 685 version.

Stu Maschwitz has also pondered this problem (referenced previously); he uses REC709 as a consistent (non-log) reference to explain both the theory of digital negative, as well as where someone should aim with exposure on the RED. His conclusion? To get headroom something like PanaLog (Panavision Genesis format), you need to under-expose by 2.6 stops. Having tested this, I wouldn’t do it… if you are willing to ignore the noise, however, you do get more headroom! (I will post results shortly).

As I suggested previously, Stu talks in terms of REC709 (which seems to have caused a furore), where he maybe should have talked about “linearized” images. Having seen all sorts of hijinks over correct conversion of Cineon files in the visual effects industry, it is amazing to see them all over again with this camera. I guess when people “own” the technology (camera, etc), things get a bit more emotional. When people position themselves as “experts” it gets even worse.

UPDATE to the UPDATE: And now this. I guess I should stop whining. A bit of a delay, but looks like RED are on it. I’d be interested to know what the “tiered partner” thing is about, though…

As part of expanding our workflows and our partner base, we are creating a tiered partner program that will roll out in full this year. This program will be how other companies can access R3D as is appropriate for them and for us. The first step is establishing RED Lead Development Partners. Apple and ASSIMLATE are the first and currently the only companies here. We have always said we will open up R3D to other partners, and we will. But we are going to do it right.

Read More