— ROGERS

Archive
Author Archive

It is interesting when you are scouring on the web for the newest thing™—be it the RED camera, or anything else—that so many reviews are now done by new owners writing on their own blogs. Some of them write excellent appraisals, some of them don’t. “Traditional media” reviews can be much the same; but usually more space limited in publication, so they are not as in-depth or obsessional as the non-traditional media. The key difference between mainstream reviewers and bloggers is that they don’t actually own the thing they are reviewing. Bloggers usually have used their own money.

So when you read blogs about the latest big thing, in my case recently, the Sigma DP1, you are usually getting the opinion of someone who really, really wants this thing to be good. Even if it is not.

423929637_f3f4d19991.jpg

The DP1 looks like a marvel on paper. The (Foveon) sensor is giant-sized amongst its rivals, which means it should be less noisy, and have better dynamic range than most. By all accounts, it seems to. The optics seem reasonable. It is quite a capable camera. People are comparing them to SLRs, and suggesting the DP1 is more like an “affordable” digital rangefinder. The wheels start to wobble when you find out that the focal distance (minimum 16cm) is quite limited and the lens is only f/4.0—especially when compared to rival cameras. Image-wise, it should be better than its rivals, but it doesn’t seem to be significantly better, and new images would suggest that it is amazingly better. But some things are pretty disappointing, like the very slow write times. Up to 12 seconds a shot… perhaps less with a faster card.

But everyone wants it to be good.

Enter Carl Rytterfalk, blogger. You can’t say that he isn’t enthusiastic about the DP1. His posts cover a range of excitement, disappointment, workarounds, and excitement again. Luckily, he is posting informative stuff on the camera… and some entertaining videos (he also blogs about the Sigma SD14, similar sensor but in an SLR body). The nice thing about his reviews are that he is unapologetic in his enthusiasm, but he doesn’t ignore the problems:


Btw, as someone said at the forum already – turning off quick preview makes the DP1 faster between shots. And I also tested a normal SD card that came with another camera – it’s SOOOO SLOW! It really takes ages. So please. Use fastest card you can find, it’s a huge difference!

Timed save times RAW (light blinking):

SanDisk Extreme III 4GB: 2.5s

Canon SD SDC 32MB: 10s

Time before you can take another shot (single mode): 3.8s and quick preview off.

If you look at his site, you’ll see he’s thorough. He even compares it (somewhat tenuously) to the RED Mysterium sensor.

It is also worth considering that so-called “bloggers” could be paid shills for whatever company they are promoting. Ever wondered how some of these guys get their hands on stuff way before everyone else? On the other hand, now that bloggers “get there first” with reviews, you have to wonder at the number of posts that are less to do with reviewing and more about soothing buyers regret. People like Carl Rytterfalk, excepted.

And the camera? Its quirks guarantee it will be a cult hit.

More reading.

Read More

This is a very interesting (100 minute!) panel discussion featuring various computer graphics industry legends (details below), who pretty much have the Bay Area and Pixar in common… anyway, this is not a super-tech, jargon-filled discussion – rather it is more like an oral history of computer graphics.

[Recorded May 16, 2005]
Brad Bird, Writer/Director, The Incredibles, Pixar Animation Studios, Ed Catmull, Co-Founder and President, Pixar Animation Studios, Alvy Ray Smith, Co-Founder of four centers of computer graphics excellence (Altamira, Pixar, Lucasfilm, New York Tech) and a Microsoft Fellow, Andrew Stanton, Writer/ Director, Finding Nemo, Pixar Animation Studios , and Michael Rubin, Moderator, Author of Droidmaker: George Lucas and the Digital Revolution

My first real computer was the Commodore Vic 20. I did have contact with computers before that (mainly Apple II’s at friends houses), but I was excited enough to spend a large part of my Saturday mornings in 1982 typing—via hunt-and-peck—small programs from magazines. Mainly they were games and mainly they didn’t work. “Syntax Error” was the bane of my life. When something did work, the computer graphics usually consisted of an “@” or a couple or greater-than symbols,or anything else you could find on a keyboard. It did, however, teach me to type.

Read More

I can’t remember where I saw the link to this… but it is a great way to share mix-tapes. Something to listen to when you are hard at work creating images: Muxtape. Created by photographer, Justin Ouellette or Chromogenic, who is in my flickr stream… maybe that’s where I saw it… it’s a small world…

It’s such a good idea that it will probably get stomped all over by the “recording industry”… but what a brilliantly simple concept. Mix tapes create relationships, save lives, and clutter top drawers. I hope this site survives!

Read More

200803261708.jpg

I was wondering when this would happen, while there have already been a few, this auction is for a “soon to ship” RED One body (the idea being you can skip the waiting list… a bit like those people that stand in line for you at Disneyland!) Check it out here. One day to go…

Read More


Kubrick — via Bagelturf — shooting in candlelight using a modified Zeiss f/0.7 lens originally intended for spy satellites. I don’t think I saw the f/0.7, but I am pretty sure the f/1 Zeiss he had modified to mount onto a Mitchell camera was at the Kubrick exhibition in the ACMI (Melbourne) last year. There is an extract from American Cinematographer about it at Visual Memory (they also have a trove of additional Stanley Kubrick archives).

Current fast lenses include the Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/1, VFX Supervisor Tommy Oshima has one… as do quite a few others… current version is $6k USD new. There is also the discontinued Canon EF 50mm f/1.0.

Read More