<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ROGERS &#187; film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/tag/film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog</link>
	<description>exhibiting some nerve</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 04:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cameron on dimension&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/17/cameron-on-dimension/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/17/cameron-on-dimension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scribble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/17/cameron-on-dimension/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a great <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117983864.html">interview</a> in Variety with James Cameron and his perspective on 3D films (pun intended). Of course, what he says is quite convincing, and salient. I met him once. He made some convincingly salient points then too. Via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a>, via <a href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/james-cameron-on-3-d">John August</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117983864.html">interview</a> in Variety with James Cameron and his perspective on 3D films (pun intended). Of course, what he says is quite convincing, and salient. I met him once. He made some convincingly salient points then too. Via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a>, via <a href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/james-cameron-on-3-d">John&nbsp;August</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/17/cameron-on-dimension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More RED</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/15/more-red/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/15/more-red/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/15/more-red/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





RED announced the following new cameras, which I am sure will be dissected and analysed (and changed) over the next year or so. Release in &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;"><a title="RED" href="http://www.red.com/" target="_top"><img style="margin-top:0px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:5px; margin-left:5px; padding-top:0px; padding-right:5px; padding-bottom:5px; padding-left:5px;" src="http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/200804150740.jpg" alt="200804150740.jpg" width="400" height="255" /></a><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;"><span class="caps">RED</span> announced the following new cameras, which I am sure will be dissected and analysed (and changed) over the next year or so. Release in 2009:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;"><span class="caps">SCARLET</span> - 3k resolution, supposedly under $3000; 2/3 sensor; fixed lens 8x T2.8 zoom. <a href="http://www.red.com/nab/scarlet">http://www.red.com/nab/scarlet</a>. More information <a href="http://redmodz.com/component/content/article/55-nab-2008/84-3k-scarlet" target="_blank">here</a>. And a off the floor video via <a href="http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2008/04/1974-red-announces-scarlet-at-nab-2008/">Videomaker</a>:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="355" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/1UzN3RuOut4&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1UzN3RuOut4&amp;hl=en" /></object></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;"><span class="caps">EPIC</span> - 5k resolution, ~$30,000; <span class="caps">RED</span> One owners get a 100% trade in; Full S35 sensor. <a href="http://www.red.com/nab/epic">http://www.red.com/nab/epic</a></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;">Red Ray - a (blue ray?) based playback system up to 4k. <a href="http://www.red.com/nab/red_ray">http://www.red.com/nab/red_ray</a></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;">Oh yeah, and some <a href="http://www.red.com/lenses" target="_blank">lenses</a>.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 11px;">The full S35 sensor in <span class="caps">EPIC</span> makes sense, especially with all the features that seem to have embraced the <span class="caps">RED</span> camera. The <span class="caps">SCARLET</span> will give Sony/Canon/Panasonic something to think about in that market (and a few other markets). As long as <span class="caps">RED</span> don&#8217;t crash and burn (my mother always warned me about things that seem too good to be true), I wouldn&#8217;t want to have an extensive future investment in telecines or film scanners. I wonder when the digital competitors will get themselves into gear?</span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/15/more-red/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The age of the plenoptic lens, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/03/the-age-of-the-plenoptic-lens-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/03/the-age-of-the-plenoptic-lens-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[desirable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/03/the-age-of-the-plenoptic-lens-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May we all see like insects: light fields and plenoptic lenses. There could well be an interesting shift in specialised photography where extracting 3D data &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May we all see like insects: light fields and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/3d-magic/adobe-tinkering-with-3d-image-manipulation-using-camera-and-software-%5Bupdated-with-video%5D-308659.php">plenoptic lenses</a>. There could well be an interesting shift in specialised photography where extracting 3D data from digital images shot with either special lenses or sensors (and with a lot of post-processing/number crunching) become useful tools for <span class="caps">VFX</span>&nbsp;practitioners.</p>
<p>(Full disclosure: like most people, I&#8217;ve had a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenticular_printing">lenticular</a> fascination since I was a kid. I just didn&#8217;t know what to call&nbsp;it&#8230;)</p>
<p>Now, of the technology, the immediate, demonstrated applications are variable focus (in post); or the ability to move the camera and change perspective within about a 10Â° arc. While this is something readily achievable in a layered composite, the implications of it being readily available and nicely packaged with a bow are quite interesting (see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_stacking">focus stacking</a>, <a href="http://www.hoothollow.com/Tip-July%202005%20HeliconFocus.html">helicon focus</a>). And, if (if!) it can be applied to moving images, then there would depth information that you could use to extract layers. That is, you wouldn&#8217;t have to pull a key; you could go without green-screen; rotoscoping would be easy&#8230; oh, the possibilities&#8230; Okay, I&#8217;m getting way ahead of the&nbsp;technology.</p>
<p>But then, beyond the &#8220;3D&#8221; hype, there have been a lot of recent, significant developments in sensor technology, such as the <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9864843-39.html">Panasonic high dynamic range sensor</a>&#8230; and even the <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9856721-39.html"><span class="caps">CIA</span> is hocking its image technology</a>. Yes, the <a href="http://www.news.com/The-secret-behind-the-CIAs-venture-capital-arm/2008-1082_3-5728548.html">Central Intelligence Agency</a>. Insert your conspiracy theories here. How about the <a href="http://www.charmedlabs.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=111">Gigapan</a> $300 (?)&nbsp;photo-robot&#8230;</p>
<p>While we may wait for <a href="http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/13/a-sniff-of-5d-mkii/">a new digital camera</a> in the coming months, we should probably bear in mind that Moore&#8217;s Law can be applied to digital photography and&nbsp;cinematography&#8230;</p>
<p>More reading: <a href="http://www.refocusimaging.com">Refocus Imaging</a>; Max Hodges <a href="http://www.maxhodges.com/2008/02/refocus-imaging-computational-cameras.html">comments</a>; Stephen Shankland <a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/digitalcameras/cameras/0,239036184,339286465,00.htm">article</a>; <a href="http://www.rdmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?PUBCODE=014&amp;ACCT=1400000100&amp;ISSUE=0803&amp;RELTYPE=PHOT&amp;PRODCODE=0000000&amp;PRODLETT=J&amp;CommonCount=0">Photography&nbsp;2.0/R&amp;D</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/03/the-age-of-the-plenoptic-lens-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shooting in candlelight</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  
  


Kubrick â€” via Bagelturf â€” shooting in candlelight using a modified Zeiss f/0.7 lens originally intended for spy satellites. I don&#8217;t &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
<p>  <object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gqkBzaFqcuE&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1&amp;hl=en" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gqkBzaFqcuE&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373" /><br />
  </object>
</div>
<p>
Kubrick â€” via <a href="http://www.bagelturf.com/files/5f01c7ccca6ab7e38d6273d989ce6217-1155.php">Bagelturf</a> â€” shooting in candlelight using a modified Zeiss f/0.7 lens originally intended for spy satellites. I don&#8217;t think I saw the f/0.7, but I am pretty sure the f/1 Zeiss he had modified to mount onto a Mitchell camera was at the <a href="http://www.acmi.net.au/kubrick_detail.htm">Kubrick exhibition</a> in the <a href="http://www.acmi.net.au/"><span class="caps">ACMI</span></a> (Melbourne) last year. There is an extract from American Cinematographer about it at <a href="http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/ac/len/page1.htm">Visual Memory</a> (they also have a trove of additional Stanley Kubrick&nbsp;<a href="http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/">archives</a>).</p>
<p>Current fast lenses include the <a href="http://en.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/lenses/2182.html">Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/1</a>, <span class="caps">VFX</span> Supervisor Tommy Oshima has <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommyoshima/tags/f10/">one</a>&#8230; as do quite a few <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/noctilux/pool/">others</a>&#8230; current version is $6k <span class="caps">USD</span> new. There is also the discontinued <a href="http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=153&amp;sort=7&amp;cat=all&amp;page=6">Canon <span class="caps">EF</span> 50mm&nbsp;f/1.0</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japanese film addicts</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/18/japanese-film-addicts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/18/japanese-film-addicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/18/japanese-film-addicts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest edition of Monocle has an article about the traction that film maintains in Japan . While the numbers may be small (film cannot &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest edition of <a href="http://www.monocle.com" target="_blank">Monocle</a> has an article about the traction that film maintains in Japan [<a href="http://www.monocle.com/sections/culture/Magazine-Articles/Film-stars---Japan/" target="_blank">Film Stars</a>]. While the numbers may be small (film cannot best the onward march of digital), it does in my opinion, illustrate something which oddly fits with the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/lofi_japan/pool/" target="_blank">Japanese psyche</a>. Retro cool? Sentimental regret? Just another <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/10312022@N00/pool/" target="_blank">Japanese subculture</a> to&nbsp;enjoy?</p>
<p>The advantage in Japan, of course, are the huge number of recently &#8220;retired&#8221; used-cameras, at very reasonable prices; an abundance of shops that will actually sell a selection of decent film stock; the ability to process black-and-white almost anywhere (!); and a huge, photo-mad, gadget-saturated&nbsp;population&#8230;</p>
<p>So does this predilection towards film indicate craft, stubbornness, or nostalgia? Probably all three. But shops such as <a href="http://www.mapcamera.com/sho/index.php" target="_blank">Map Camera</a> â€” stocked to the rafters with beautiful, mint-condition, second hand cameras â€” are a seductive sight. It isn&#8217;t hard in Japan to arm yourself with a pretty decent camera and a pocket full of film. There is even choice: from obscure Soviet cameras to large format ones <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/clarice_e_simon/360256292/in/set-72157594460465420/" target="_blank">as big as your head</a>, which can be found inside and out of the normal camera <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www.fujiya-camera.co.jp/" target="_blank">shop</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://books.google.com.au/books?id=alKrRjsAYfEC&amp;pg=PA282&amp;lpg=PA282&amp;dq=shinjuku+camera+shop+map&amp;source=web&amp;ots=yMeimjELQ_&amp;sig=p15r5Tr4MDQRPy1biXiOqupxXeM&amp;hl=en#PPA282,M1" target="_blank">radar</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet that a lot of the people chewing through film have come from shooting a lot of digital. In going back to film, they get to prove their photographic chops without&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimping" target="_blank">chimping</a>.</p>
<p>The result of all this is that there are film-loaded cameras in Japan exposing away in almost pointed contrition for <a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/digitalcameras/cameras/0,239036184,339285785,00.htm" target="_blank">discarded</a> analogue ways. Of course this happens in other countries, but perhaps without the same readily accessible&nbsp;fervour.</p>
<p>Firing off exposures as loosely as people do with digital cameras may just create more visual noise â€“ but there will always be <a href="http://www.rayon-vert.com/" target="_blank">beauty</a> that emerges from the&nbsp;rough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/18/japanese-film-addicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
