<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ROGERS &#187; photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/tag/photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog</link>
	<description>Ravings of a raconteur and randonneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blowing dust</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/05/11/blowing-dust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/05/11/blowing-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 04:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scribble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/05/11/blowing-dust/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A smattering dust can really ruin a good scan. Watching the local film processing guy drop your neg on his putrid floor (imbecile!) can raise your blood pressure faster than you can say C41!

So I've been having problems with little smatterings of dust on most of my scans. And the scanner I use doesn't have Digital ICE (it's an old Minolta - keepin' it real). After using a few of the available software-based anti-dust systems out there, I remained unconvinced. On the discussion boards, people were saying to do it by hand. For bigger bits, sure, but a billion tiny grains...?

I decided it was simple to do better. I wrote (in the loosest sense) a Photoshop action which reduces dust, but doesn't remove all the grain from the photo.

It is does all this with a difference matte made from the original (dusty) image, and a version that has been run through the Photoshop Dust &#38; Scratches filter. Old school like.

It aint fancy. (download after the <a href="http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/05/11/blowing-dust/">jump</a>)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/05/11/blowing-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth and the chaff</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/02/the-truth-and-the-chaff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/02/the-truth-and-the-chaff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[critical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desirable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scribble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting when you are scouring on the web for the newest thing&#8482;&#8212;be it the RED camera, or anything else&#8212;that so many reviews are now done by new owners writing on their own blogs. Some of them write excellent appraisals, some of them don&#8217;t. &#8220;Traditional media&#8221; reviews can be much the same; but usually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/04/02/the-truth-and-the-chaff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shooting in candlelight</title>
		<link>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kubrick &#8212; via Bagelturf &#8212; shooting in candlelight using a modified Zeiss f/0.7 lens originally intended for spy satellites. I don&#8217;t think I saw the f/0.7, but I am pretty sure the f/1 Zeiss he had modified to mount onto a Mitchell camera was at the Kubrick exhibition in the ACMI (Melbourne) last year. There [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rogers.id.au/blog/2008/03/25/shooting-in-candlelight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 318/329 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.rogers.id.au @ 2012-02-06 22:51:45 -->
